G2.6 P1.6: stabilize multi-RCB dynamic DataSet identity - #105
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Goal
Make P1.6 multi-RCB dynamic runtime safe under ARSAS' mandatory per-plan fresh execution revalidation.
The generic hybrid planner numbers temporary DataSets by plan order (
AR_HYB_01,AR_HYB_02, ...). During execution ARSAS intentionally revalidates one RCB immediately before each write; an isolated second group would otherwise renumber to_01, potentially colliding with the already-active first DataSet when both RCBs live in the same logical device.Change
Adds
MmsGuardedDynamicReportFieldCapabilityStableRuntimePlanner, a narrow wrapper over PR #104's field-capability planner. It changes only temporary dynamic DataSet identity:AR_HYB_<SHA256-prefix>name derived from its RCB reference;Non-change
Regression
Tests prove full-plan vs isolated-revalidation stability for the same RCB, uniqueness across two RCBs in the same logical device, and that static segments / ProductionEligible boundary remain unchanged.